Why is Water Cheaper Than Diamonds?

The concept of valuing goods based on need instead of scarcity is a fascinating one, as it challenges traditional economic notions of supply and demand. Instead, this approach suggests that a good’s value should be determined by how useful it is in meeting basic human needs rather than by how rare it is.

From a purely rational economic perspective, this idea may seem impractical since scarcity is a fundamental principle of economics. Scarce resources are more valuable because people are willing to pay more for them, driving market prices higher. For example, diamonds, which are relatively rare, are more expensive than water, which is abundant.

Despite this, there are valid arguments for valuing goods based on needs beyond rational economics. For instance, proponents of this approach argue that access to basic human needs like clean water should be a fundamental human right. Pricing such items at a level that only the wealthy can afford effectively denies access to essential resources to those who need them the most. In addition, valuing goods based on need could lead to a more equitable distribution of resources. By prioritizing the allocation of resources towards basic needs such as food, water, and shelter, society would incentivize the prioritization of these items over luxury goods that serve no practical purpose.

However, this approach also has its potential downsides. One major concern is that it could lead to market inefficiencies. If a good’s market price does not reflect its scarcity, producers may have little incentive to increase supply in response to increased demand. Additionally, determining what constitutes a “basic need” could be challenging, leading to subjective valuations of goods and services. Moreover, there is a risk that a government or centralized authority could abuse this approach to control resource distribution. Setting prices for goods and services based on perceived usefulness could enable governments to restrict access to certain items or manipulate the market in favor of particular groups or individuals.

In conclusion, valuing goods based on need rather than scarcity challenges traditional economic theory. While it offers potential benefits, there are significant drawbacks to consider. Achieving the right balance between valuing goods based on usefulness and allowing market forces to determine prices is a complex challenge requiring careful consideration of a wide range of economic, social, and ethical factors.

Related posts:

Business Transformation, and its close partner Digital Transformation, are terms we’re suddenly hearing everywhere — and yet as Business Transformation specialists here at Rulesware, we’re still…

Should we work with Facebook and Google? This is the question Mathew Ingram asks of the journalism industry in his article, ‘The platform patrons’. Funding from technology companies, including…